Visual Literacy Conference

St. Patrick’s Day; a beautiful day here that was celebrated in a different way this year; a conference, inside, oblivious of the weather but fantastic nonetheless. Tom Crawford and I put on our first Visual Thinking Conference at Oakland Schools on March 17, 2012. Like all of Tom’s projects it was brilliant.

We had a fantastic group of presenters: Jamie Nast, Cliff Atkinson, Brandy Agerbeck, Ryan Coleman, Karl Gude, Laura Johnson, Tom Crawford, Conan Heiselt, Matt Pierce, and  Chad Simon. They covered many interesting topics from autism to idea mapping to Power-Points and much in between. Brandy also graphically captured the keynote presentations (see above). The audience were made up of business people and educators, with Tech Smith sponsoring much of the conference.

Thanks to everyone who presented, attended, and facilitated to make this a great day.

Next year we will do it again, April 13, 2012.

Here is the link: http://www.vizliteracy.com/conference/

We will use it for next year’s conference.

I remember …

Today I recalled part of my childhood, I remembered Nana Atti, a figure from almost 50 years ago. I never knew Nana Atti’s first name, although I feel it would have been something like Gwen. Her last name was Atkinson, hence – Atti.

She was no relation and, in fact, I have no idea how she suddenly appeared in our life. I know my mother liked here, and that was all there was to that. We visited often, at least for as long as Nana Atti was alive.
Her house was dark, not unfriendly, just dark and somewhat musty. Her furniture was spare and old and all she needed. It seemed to give her comfort. Even as a child, I sensed she carried a loss, though her surroundings comforted her. I never met, nor heard of, Grandpa Atti. I presume, now, he must have passed, as a child his absence was of no note; my father was a sailor, away at sea more than at home.

On Nana Atti’s farm was a tall, broad branched tree. It called me aloft almost every time I was there. Smooth eucalypt bark and ample branches cradled me.  Even as a child, I felt the tree was like Nana Atti,;it held me close, the dust and pollen like the powder of Nana Atti as she hugged me into to her ample bosom. The earthy smell of eucalypts not unlike the scent of age that Nana had.

I wandered freely around that farm, collecting eggs, stepping in manure, and patting the sheep. I enjoyed the unfettered freedom of a boy exploring another world. We always left with some farm produce, some bounty from an afternoon in the sun with Nana Atti.

Although I had not know her for long, I felt a sadness when my mother told me Nana Atti had died, I am not sure how I heard that they found her, in the outhouse, seated and dead.  I found her form of dying fitting rather than sad, for Nana Atti seemed to embrace life, the only way it could have been taken from her would have been when she was forced to be still. I believe she would have been accepted this turn of events as she did everything. My biggest regret now is that I never truly knew her, I wished I had had the time to listen to her wisdom. Maybe that is what my mother sought when she befriended her.

Goal for November

I am intrigued with writing, so much so I joined NaNoWriMo, committing to writing 50, 000 words in the month of November. Well, I crossed my fingers on that goal and hope to write a daily blog entry, comment on others work, and respond to others posts to get my word count up. I will track my writing with 750 wordcount.com. So it appears, even to me, that the lofty goal of 50,000 words for the month is a little too high. Nonetheless, I think I will shoot for 10,000 a week giving me 40,000 for the month. That is a lot of writing.

If you are reading this blog, it will be quite eclectic, may have spelling and grammar errors (I will try to limit them) for my goal is quantity and the entries may not tie together. I pondered if I should do this without putting it on a blog. I decided to put it on a blog as a consequence of reading Mediactive. http://www.amazon.com/Mediactive-ebook/dp/B004EPZ3C2/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1319941727&sr=8-2

I read this book using the Kindle app on my computer. This is not my preferred way of reading, but I found this interactive book great to read this way. I took notes, highlighted and explored the links. I printed up my notes and reviewed what I had highlighted. I think I learned more this way.

One point the author made was that one should participate with the media, (hence the title: Mediactive?) so … blogging, commenting on posts and interacting with the media is my goal, at least for November. I wonder how I will be changed when December rolls around.

Detroit Marathon

Critical literacy suggests every text positions itself to privilege certain viewpoints and in so doing, diminishes others. No text can be all to everything. Taking the viewpoint that a text is something that creates meaning, the Detroit Marathon may, in this view, be considered a text.

I ran as a member of a relay team today. We did well, the top 10% of relay teams. Can this event be considered in terms of critical literacy?

When I look at what was privileged it certainly was exercise, not so much slothfulness. It also privileged the right of runners to take over a city, a bridge, and a tunnel. But when I look closer I feel the shadow of my beliefs fall across my interpretation.

This perturbs me. Does critical literacy become a frame for justifying my beliefs or a lens to consider the views of others? I would like to believe I find an open space where the views of the motorist who cannot drive to where she wants to go, to the homeless man who cannot sleep in his usual place, to the local resident who has paper cups strewn across the road, to the runner who staggers to complete the event, sit together and share their views, knowing that no one has the true picture, although everyone has a piece.

So today, the Detroit Marathon became a text that indicated that there are many, legitimate, viewpoints, which coexist, maybe not comfortably, and make a tapestry of life. What I am wrestling with is this; does critical literacy foster this integration or does it become a tool for consolidating one view, … mine?

Thinking and cell phones

There are more cell phones than people in the United States. (http://www.dailywireless.org/2011/10/11/cell-phones-exceed-us-population/)

While I am sure most of them are in the hands of drivers, this number includes children, old people, and the poor. A fascinating statistic to consider in light of 21st Century learning.

How is this changing how we think and learn? I believe that the ease of access to this communication tool has to shape how we communicate. My phone is audio/visual; it has a small screen so I prefer short texts. I understand, and even use, text abbreviations, and often prefer to text than speak.  My phone makes different noises for different messages. Whereas once a text was permanent on paper, it now vibrates, moves, makes noise, can be interacted with, and can be deleted.

Is this changing how I learn, how I think? And if I don’t wish to engage with it, am I left behind? Where once words were king (or queen), now that exist beside visuals and even sound at times.

To answer my own question, it is probably self-evident it is changing learning, albeit slowly if we are looking at schools. But what about thinking, do I think differently as a result of my cell phone, my computer, my iPad?

These are exciting and destabilizing times. I feel that I am on the crest of a wave, sometimes caught in the breaking water and a little panicked, sometimes on the face of the wave and exhilarated, but also fearful of losing the ride.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.